BLOG

Thermal management moves to the center of vehicle development

Mariestella Colón Astacio, Director | Creative & Media
October 30, 2026
Thermal managementElectric vehiclesVehicle integrationVehicle testing

At the Automotive Testing Expo in Novi, engineers from Ford, GM, and Stellantis on SAE's Thermal Management Committee explained why thermal decisions now belong at the architecture stage.

Thermal management moves to the center of vehicle development

Tuesday, October 27, 2026. Day 1, Automotive Testing Expo, Novi. “Thermal management: A fireside chat.” Dr. Gursaran D. (GD) Mathur, PE, HVAC System Design, Ford Motor Company; Sowmya Jayaraman, Thermal Lead, Next Gen Electric Vehicles, General Motors; Aamir Khawaja, Technical Fellow, HVAC Systems, Stellantis.

At Automotive Testing Expo, George Ayres and I listened to three engineers from SAE's Thermal Management Committee explain why thermal management has moved to the center of vehicle development.

One requirement, every subsystem

Range, cabin comfort, towing, and track performance all draw on the same thermal system, so one customer requirement flows into the battery, the cabin, the front end, and the power electronics at once. Sowmya explained that these targets compete with each other, which is why the balance between them has to be settled at the architecture stage, before subsystems are designed. Aamir added that thermal is now the one system responsible for keeping everything from the cabin to the engine working efficiently.

More variants, less time

Battery packs can now be cooled by immersion or indirectly, heat pumps add complexity, software-defined vehicle architecture is arriving, and combustion and battery electric vehicles both make sense in the market again. One OEM may be developing all of these at once while global competition compresses development cycles, so thermal teams carry more variants with less time to engineer each one.

Cabin air quality as an EV requirement

Cabin air quality is now an EV engineering requirement as well. GD, author of over 120 technical papers for SAE and ASHRAE, said that since the pandemic it includes CO2 levels and how a virus travels through the cabin. Recirculating air saves battery energy while letting CO2 build up, so comfort and range compete for the same airflow.

Simulation speeds up, physical testing stays

Sowmya noted that one year is now long enough for a regulation to change under a program, which puts pressure on how fast a thermal system can be validated. She pointed to software-in-the-loop simulation and AI-enabled tools that draw on legacy program data to pick the right simulation at each stage and focus physical testing where it adds the most. GD added that CAE and CFD can now bring an HVAC design close to final, and he was clear that physical testing remains critical.

Where suppliers should start the conversation

Thermal management, as these engineers described it, is a vehicle-level discipline where the biggest decisions are made early and physical testing goes to the questions simulation can't settle. Suppliers of thermal components and test equipment will have their most valuable conversations with the architecture teams balancing those vehicle targets, well before a part spec or test plan reaches the table.

Explore more

Go deeper on this topic

Talk to us

Selling thermal components or test equipment to OEMs?

Talk with AMA
Sowmya Jayaraman (GM), GD Mathur (Ford), and Aamir Khawaja (Stellantis)
On LinkedIn

What people are saying

Continue reading

More from the AMA team.

Book a call

Talk to us about what you want to accomplish

Schedule 20-minutes with AMA. We will use the time to understand what you are trying to accomplish and how AMA can help.

George Ayres, Denise Barfuss, Chip Goetzinger, and Allen Levenson of AutoMobility Advisors at MOVE America.